This blog might ruffle some feathers, but I think it’s time to address this issue, given all the changes happening in the world (which is a whole other story). The incident with Charlotte D. and the treatment of a horse, while unfortunate, has sparked a necessary conversation.
Seeing the equestrian community clutch their pearl necklaces in shock over this incident is perplexing to me. I’ve witnessed similar behavior from general owners, trainers, and even veterinary professionals. So why the shock now?
I remember an experience with a certain vet who decided to "teach" my horse a lesson and told me I was a "f#$ked horse person." Much like what Charlotte did, this vet's actions were perplexing and intimidating. I was relieved when he threw back my horse's rope and stormed off to his car.
Back in the caveman days, our bond with horses was based on mutual reliance. We depended on them to be fit and healthy to carry out everyday tasks. But as we "evolved," we began expecting these creatures to be as compliant as a tractor or a car, doing everything we want without question. But who—or what animal—does that?
In my experience treating horses, I often find that their issues are more vibrational or emotional than physical. Yes, I'm into that "WooWoo" stuff, and my goal is to get those who believe a horse should be 100% compliant or free of emotional issues to see things differently. If that’s not in line with your beliefs, I might not be the right fit for you.
A quote I heard summed up the Charlotte incident perfectly. I'll paraphrase: if Charlotte were a man and the horse was a woman, and the man hit the woman 24 times, would we say, “Oh, we’ve all done something bad. It’s all good; they’re a champion”? My reaction is a resounding NO. We wouldn’t find it acceptable, so why are people making excuses now?
Comments